Summit
2016
April
1-2, Washington DC
Session 7: Saturday
8:00
Moderator: Wesley Bulla
Joe Miglio
Associate Professor of Music Business/Management
Berklee College of Music
Going for the Gold: Articulating Standards and Best Practices for
Experiential Learning
The purpose of this session is to offer an overview and methodology for
assessing the current instructional practices and program designs
associated with Problem/Project-Based and Experiential Learning.
Recognized as authentic or real-world learning, problem/project-based
learning and experiential learning are used in a variety of “next gen
learning environments” to help students apply the core content they
acquire. Through an interdependent design built on inquiry,
project-based learning, internships, service-learning, and
entrepreneurial innovation, students directly witness the relevance of
academic content and simultaneously develop their skills in critical
thinking, communication, collaboration, and creativity. These “4 C’s
skills” are integral in student learning, providing a cognitive
connection for theory into practice, and in their demonstration of
employability preparedness. Are there unifying principles and practices
that are essential and imperative to this model of learning? Can we
create a model of excellence in experiential learning that insures the
comprehension, application, and synthesis of knowledge that is both
person- and profession-centered? These questions will be
addressed in this session and will also include an analysis of my Music
Business Management course – Advanced Management Techniques – that has
been redesigned to investigate these areas of investigation.
Todd D. Gardner
Associate Professor of Music Business/Management
Berklee College of Music
Educators Achieving Reflective Competence in Music Related Instruction
The purpose of this paper is to make educators aware of a theory of
stages in which students learn new skills and the associated risk of
educator complacency. This learning theory is known as, “Conscious
Competence Learning Model.” This model has been reported for several
decades and is equally helpful in understanding how students learn to
play a musical instrument or how they learn any other subject, such as
taxation or accounting, in music business. This paper will also attempt
to outline potential skills and strategies to overcome educator
complacency.
The theory of Conscious Competence Learning Model suggests that there
are four stages that an educator should be aware of to help facilitate
the teaching of a new skill to a learner. Learners usually begin at
stage 1 or, “unconscious incompetence.” This stage states that the
learner does not even know that the skill exists. Learners then move
onto stage 2 or, “conscious incompetence.” In this stage the learner is
aware of the skill, but cannot yet do the skill. Learners then pass to
stage 3 or, “conscious competence.” With this stage learners know or
can achieve the skill but have to fully concentrate in order to achieve
the skill. As learners progress, the goal is to pass to stage 4 or,
"unconscious competence.” With this stage learners can achieve the
skill without concentration and in a sense cease to be learners. The
theory also holds that none of these stages can be skipped and that a
learner may actually regress to lower stages at times.
Unfortunately, many educators, because of their high competency and
mastery in a given skill or subject, run the risk of less than optimal
instruction or complacency. Ironically, this may be due to the fact
that they have mastered the very subject they are teaching and have
become “unconsciously competent” themselves. This has led some
educators to suggest that there is or should be a 5th stage. This 5th
stage is sometimes termed as, "Conscious Competence of Unconscious
Competence” or, “Reflective Competence.” This describes an educator’s
ability to recognize and develop unconscious incompetence in learners
as well as being “highly conscious" or “enlightened” of their own
consciousness such that they become better educators.
By identifying the four or possibly five stages of learning, educators
of music, with all of its various appendages, can hopefully eliminate
the assumption that all learners are actually learning what is being
taught. Further, by being aware of these stages, educators can develop
skills and strategies to help them become highly conscious of what and
when instruction is needed so that the educators themselves do not
become complacent or unconscious due to their mastery. This allows for
more individual consideration of learners and may direct future
research on how students learn and teachers should teach.